Factors Affecting Broiler Breeders Following the Partnership Pattern in Gelumbang Subdistrict, Muara Enim District (An Anthropological Sociological Approach)

Authors

  • Acip Rakhmat Agribusiness Program, Agriculture Faculty, University of South Sumatra, Palembang 30967, South Sumatra, Indonesia
  • Sriati Sriati Agribusiness Program, Agriculture Faculty, Sriwijaya University, Indralaya 30662, South Sumatra, Indonesia
  • M Yamin Agribusiness Program, Agriculture Faculty, Sriwijaya University, Indralaya 30662, South Sumatra, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36706/jlso.11.1.2022.558

Keywords:

breeders perception, partnership pattern, determinants of decision makers

Abstract

The partnership pattern is one of the choices of business patterns faced by boiler breeders. This study aimed to describe and analyze the factors influencing the breeders to decide to follow the partnership pattern, calculate and compare the income of broiler farming business through partnership and independent patterns and analyze the perceptions of broiler breeders on the pattern to be applied to the next business cycle. The method used in this research was a survey method and stratified random sampling. The results of the study showed that the factors of venture capital, skills, result marketing and risk of loss, the marketing factor of the results were the most significant factors affecting the decision of farmers to follow the partnership pattern. It was found that the partnership pattern provided an average profit of Rp. 40,138,384.88 higher than the independent business pattern which was only Rp. 33,029,505.00 in one production period. When viewed in terms of Return Cost Ratio (R/C), livestock business through a partnership pattern was 1.19, lower than the R/C independent livestock business with a value of 1.20. Meanwhile, for the Food Conversion Ratio (FCR), both partnership and independent livestock businesses had the same value, namely 1.26. When viewed from the performance index, the livestock business through the partnership pattern had an IP of 4.25 greater in value when compared to the independent business pattern which was only 4.19. The breeders following the partnership pattern tended to decide to continue to follow the partnership pattern even though they had sufficient capital and skills, afforded to market their products independently, and faced their own risks.

Keywords: breeders perception, partnership pattern, determinants of decision makers

References

Adrizal A, Yusrizal Y, Fakhri S, Haris W, Ali E, Angel CR. 2011. Feeding native laying hens diets containing palm kernel meal with or without enzyme supplementations: 1. Feed conversion ratio and egg production. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 20 (1): 40–49. DOI: 10.3382/ japr.2010-00196.

Amam A, Fanani Z, Hartono B, Nugroho BA. 2019. The power of resources in independent livestock farming business in Malang District, Indonesia. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 372 (1): 2019. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/372/1/012055.

Padangaran AM, Bafadal A, Nuryadi AM, Nur M, Rosmalah S. 2017. The business models for broiler production in South Konawe Regency of South-East Sulawesi Province, Indonesia. ABAH Bioflux. 9 (1): 28–36.

Wulandari A, Junaedi J, Suparman S. 2019. Fattening Management of Independent Broiler Chicken Business (case study in a ranch owned by Mr. Andi Mukri in Anaiwoi Neighborhoods of Tanggetada District). Chalaza J. Anim. Husb. 4 (1): 30–35. DOI: 10.31327/chalaza.v4i1.935.

Wantasen E, Umboh SJK, Leke JR. 2021. Investment advantages of broiler production using the partnership system: A study in Indonesia. J. Agric. Sci. - Sri Lanka. 16 (2): 215–225. DOI: 10.4038/jas.v16i2.9325.

Utami HD, Nugroho BA, Ningsih UW, Radiati LE, Nugroho H. 2018. Broiler Partnerships Scheme Advantages toward Minimising Its Production and Marketing Risks at Mojokerto Indonesia. J. Adv. Agric. Technol. 5 (3): 222–226. DOI: 10.18178/joaat.5.3.222-226.

Azizah JAPS, Febrianto N. 2019. Communications network of broiler farmers. Partnership. 2 (6): 328–336.

Kalangi LS, Lombogia SOB, Regar MN. 2021. Analysis of Income on the Partnership Program-based Broiler Business in Regency of North Minahasa, North Sulawesi, Indonesia. Int. J. Appl. Bus. Int. Manag. 6 (1): 14–24. DOI: 10.32535/ijabim.v6i1.937.

Dahlan M, Fanani Z, Ihsan MN, Natsir MH. 2020. Swot analysis of broiler cultivation partnership pattern system in Sumenep District, East Java Province. Abstract. 3 (1): 35–39.

Ridwan M, Sudirman I. 2021. Integration of the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) - Balance score card (BSC) model in selection of broiler agribusiness partnership model to increase income of the breeders partner in South Sulawesi. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 788 (1). DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/ 788/1/012215.

Ridwan M, Kasim K. 2020. Cooperation-based partnership model with the partnership of authorities solution for improving broiler agribusiness partnership systems in increasing partner income. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 492 (1). DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/492/1/012143.

Rondhi M, Aji JMM, Khasan AF, Yanuarti R. 2020. Factors affecting farmers’ participation in contract farming: The case of broiler sector in Indonesia. Trop. Anim. Sci. J. 43 (2): 183–190. DOI: 10.5398/TASJ.2020.43.2.183.

Sugiarto M, Wakhidati YN, Gandasari D. 2021. The Decision of Broiler Chicken Farmers to Sustain Business During Pandemic Era in Indonesia. SSRN Electron. J. 2020: 1–19. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3830407.

Azmi N, Nugroho BA, Azizah S. 2018 Evaluation of plasma farmers satisfaction on the broiler partnership system and the relationship between partnership duration and satisfaction level (Case Study : PT. Mitratama Karya Abadi). 3 (4): 215–219

Haryuni N. 2017. Study of feasibility on broiler business development. J. Dev. Res. 1 (2): 63. DOI: 10.28926/ jdr.v1i2.25.

Suryanti R, Sumardjo S, Syahyuti S, Tjitropranoto P. 2019. The business capacity of broiler farmers in the partnership business pattern. J. Indones. Trop. Anim. Agric. 44 (3): 314–322. DOI: 10.14710/jitaa.44.3.314-322.

Santoso SI, Sarjana TA, Setiadi A. 2018. Income analysis of closed house broiler farm with partnership business model. Bul. Peternak. 42 (2): 164–169. DOI: 10.21059/ buletinpeternak. v42i2.33222.

Kilic S. 2015. Binary logistic regression analysis. J. Mood Disord. 5 (4): 191. DOI: 10.5455/jmood.20151202122141.

Nurtini S, Muzayyanah MAU, Haryadi FT, Hakim A. 2017. Performance of broiler farmer in partnerships system at Surakarta, Indonesia. J. Adv. Agric. Technol. 4 (2): 196–199. DOI: 10.18178/joaat.4.2.196-199.

Rohani S, Aminawar M, Siregar AR, Darwis M, Kurniawan ME. 2019. Farmers satisfaction level on broiler partnership system in Tompobulu District, Maros Regency, South Sulawesi Province, Indonesia. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 247 (1). DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/247/1/012057.

Singh S, Ajay, Masuku MB. 2014. Sampling Techniques & Dertermining Sample Size in Applied Statistics Research: an Overview. Int. J. Econ. Commer. Manag. II (11): 1–22.

Suparto S. 2021. Contract farming in Indonesia : Implementation of the balance principle in realizing equitable agribusiness. 18 (8): 64–75.

Suwarta S, Hanafie R. 2021. The production risk of broiler farm management at plasma breeders: Evidence from Indonesia. J. Socioecon. Dev. 4 (1): 134. DOI: 10.31328/ jsed.v4i1.1501.

Kusumastuti TA, Widiati R, Andarwati S. 2019. Characteristics of business and income in broiler partnership system in Yogyakarta Indonesia. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 387 (1). DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/387/1/012041.

Unang. 2003. Profitability and efficiency of the broiler industry in tasikmalaya,” no. February. Indonesia, pp. 1–23.

Mappigau P. 2012. Entrepreneurial quality of smale scale (SMEs) broiler farming with independent business model in maros district of South Sulawesi Provincy, Indonesia. Int. J. Bus. Soc. Sci. 2012.

Downloads

Published

2022-04-01

How to Cite

Rakhmat, A., Sriati, S., & Yamin, M. (2022). Factors Affecting Broiler Breeders Following the Partnership Pattern in Gelumbang Subdistrict, Muara Enim District (An Anthropological Sociological Approach). Jurnal Lahan Suboptimal : Journal of Suboptimal Lands, 11(1), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.36706/jlso.11.1.2022.558

Issue

Section

Articles